Skip to main content

Courtesy of pass over/adjournment

 The courtesy of pass over or adjournment granted to counsel in Indian courts is a discretionary accommodation, not an absolute right. Misinterpreting this courtesy as a right undermines judicial efficiency and can cause delays and injustice in proceedings.livelaw+2

Role of Passover and Adjournment

Passovers and adjournments are provided to counsel to address scheduling clashes or genuine exigencies. Courts may extend these courtesies to ensure fair representation, but they expect counsel to manage their diaries responsibly and avoid unnecessary delays for the opposing party. The absence of clear legislation controlling this tendency has made pass over and adjournments susceptible to misuse.timesofindia.indiatimes+2

Judicial Perspective and Cautions

Recently, the Delhi High Court clarified that these accommodations are not matters of right but privilege, subject to judicial discretion. Abuse by seeking repeated adjournments or producing false reasons for passover is frowned upon, and can lead to adverse costs and closure of rights such as cross-examination. The judiciary actively discourages forming a culture of “adjournment counsels” who routinely delay proceedings and avoid substantive arguments.latestlaws+3

Practice and Procedure

Courts like the Supreme Court require applications for adjournment to be made in advance with valid grounds, and proof of service to opposing counsel. Excuses such as counsel’s unavailability or medical emergencies must be substantiated, and repeated requests without merit often attract penalties or refusal. Judges encourage junior lawyers to argue when present, reinforcing that legal representation is about substantive engagement, not merely seeking procedural delays.linkedin+4

Implications of Misuse

The misuse of pass over and adjournment leads to delayed justice, unnecessary prolongation of litigation, and sometimes unfair advantages for one party. Courts observe these tactics and may limit or completely withdraw the privilege, emphasizing that the judicial process should not be subordinated to the convenience of counsel.linkedin+3

Conclusion

Passover and adjournment are judicial courtesies designed to facilitate justice, not tools for indefinite procrastination. Lawyers need to respect the boundaries of these privileges, prioritize preparation, and avoid misconstruing them as entitlements under Indian legal practice.livelaw+3



  1. https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/courtesy-of-passover-adjournment-to-counsel-should-not-be-miscounstrued-as-their-right-delhi-high-court-310249
  2. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/ajayamitabhsumanspeaks/pass-over-and-adjournment-judicial-way-to-commit-injustice-45276/
  3. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nishant-verma-7b3770126_passover-adjournment-activity-7110986348114698240-tgLN
  4. https://www.latestlaws.com/case-analysis/courtesy-of-pass-overs-is-not-a-right-litigants-cannot-misuse-adjournments-231343/
  5. https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-judge-bv-nagarathna-adjournment-pass-over-counsel-236646
  6. https://lawrato.com/civil-legal-advice/how-to-avoid-regular-passovers-taken-by-the-opposite-party-245496
  7. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/amish-aggarwala-45978246_highcourt-supremecourt-law-activity-7197430697555320832-Wr92
  8. https://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/articles/2005_2_41.htm
  9. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~roni/11761/2017_fall_assignments/hw3_stats_google_1gram.txt
  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuqvXn6bOeo
  11. https://www.scribd.com/document/536008492/texto-41
  12. https://www.facebook.com/allindiareporter/posts/senior-advocate-harish-salve-has-informed-the-supreme-court-that-a-request-seeki/1040034404833415/
  13. https://www.instagram.com/reel/C7A6v-bK5Vl/?hl=en

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Current Impact of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam

India’s legal landscape is evolving with the introduction of three important legal statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). These laws collectively aim to reform and harmonize criminal, criminal procedure, and evidence laws in India, reflecting the principles of modern governance and justice. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is the proposed comprehensive criminal code replacing the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It emphasizes clarity, uniformity, and modernization in penal provisions. Its impact is visible in efforts to simplify language, remove outdated colonial-era provisions, and incorporate more victim-centric and human rights-oriented approaches. Legal practitioners and citizens are seeing it as a step towards more transparent and fair criminal justice. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) The BNSS seeks to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). It introduces r...

Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Withheld on the Basis of Future Enquiry in India

In India, pension is not just an optional payment given after retirement—it is the rightful due of every employee who has completed the required years of service. Pension and retirement benefits are seen as a reward for years of hard work and dedication, and they play a crucial role in ensuring financial security for senior citizens. Sometimes, however, confusion arises when government departments or employers withhold pensionary benefits on the ground that some enquiry or investigation might be started in the future. This is unfair, and the legal position in India is very clear: retirement benefits cannot be denied merely because there may be a possibility of a future enquiry . Why Withholding Pension on Such Grounds is Wrong Pension is an earned right for services already rendered—it is not a favour or charity. Unless there is an enquiry or case that has already started before retirement, the department cannot stop or delay pension. Just a possibility, proposal, or intern...

Service of Arbitral Award in the Indian Legal System

One of the most crucial stages in arbitration proceedings is the service of the arbitral award . While much attention is often paid to the conduct of arbitration hearings and the making of the award itself, the legal consequences truly begin when the award is delivered and duly served upon the parties. In Indian arbitration law, the concept of service holds significant importance because it is directly linked to the limitation period for challenging the award, as well as for initiating enforcement proceedings. Statutory Basis under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 The governing law is the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”), particularly Section 31 which deals with the form and contents of the arbitral award, and Section 34(3) which prescribes limitation for setting aside the award. Section 31(5) : It specifically provides that after the arbitral award is made, a signed copy shall be delivered to each party . The word used is "delivered" rather t...